349. May 3, 2006. #1. IS 2 is the best tank of WW2 it has much better and thicker armor than the panther in reality unlike in ro where their armor is about the same. IS 2 can penetrate panthers frontal hull armor plate from 1200 meters virtualy every time while the panther may penetrate the IS 2 frontal armor plate from only 600-700 meters
In comparison IS-2 vs Tiger II, also known as King Tiger or Royal Tiger, we dive into their characteristics and performance to determine which one was the best Heavy tank of World War
The Tiger I fares like the Pershing, fairly balanced with weak spots for the trained eye or the un-angled tank. Now for the comparison of the IS-2 and the Tiger II on the other hand(these stats are based purely on experience,no looking into the game files etc, this is simply the result of practical application): 122mm vs Tiger II Armor: The
The topic of Sherman vs. Tiger is one of the most consistently popular ones that comes up during the discussion of WWII armoured warfare. Despite the years that have passed, such simple questions as "at what range can a Sherman penetrate the Tiger's armour" can get results ranging from "point blank" to "not at all".
The is3 is a straight better tank than the obsolete and rather pointless tiger 2. A mid range heavy sniper with no dpm is called a bad tank. Of course you can play second line support and side scrape with the tiger 2 but all of those roles are simply less useful than the is3s out trading and mobility capabilities.
The M103 was a sixty-two-ton vehicle with a crew of five. It had a maximum speed of just twenty-one miles per hour, and even with a 268-gallon gas tank, it only had a range of eighty miles, It was
BY4I. 83yw9oje2z.pages.dev/35683yw9oje2z.pages.dev/45283yw9oje2z.pages.dev/52583yw9oje2z.pages.dev/53983yw9oje2z.pages.dev/17383yw9oje2z.pages.dev/23083yw9oje2z.pages.dev/20983yw9oje2z.pages.dev/140
is 2 tank vs tiger
